JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 27, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Rafael Antonio Cardona Londoño·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela En Materia De Pension De Sobrevivientes De Hijo Fallecido
  • Rechazar solicitud de aclaración de sentencia T-868/11 por extemporánea
Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Reiteración improcedencia de aclaración
Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia dentro del término de ejecutoria de oficio o a petición de parte
  • Procedencia respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de Aclaración Sentencia.

El memorialista solicitó que se aclarara la sentencia T-868/11, en el sentido de establecer si las 50 semanas que deben aparecer cotizadas ante Citicolfondos son durante los tres años anteriores al fallecimiento de su hijo o durante toda su vida laboral.

La Sala RECHAZA por improcedente la solicitud impetrada, toda vez que se presentó de manera extemporánea.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE
  2. RECHAZAR la solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia T- 868 de 2011.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.